Intel Data Center GPU Flex 140 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 880M
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 6GB VRAM Data Center GPU Flex 140 and 1024MB VRAM Quadro FX 880M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Intel Data Center GPU Flex 140 's Advantages
Released 12 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock1950MHz
More VRAM (6GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (186.0GB/s vs 25.28GB/s)
976 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro FX 880M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (35W vs 75W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Data Center GPU Flex 140
+3343%
3.994 TFLOPS
Quadro FX 880M
0.116 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Aug 2022
Release Date
Jan 2010
Data Center GPU
Generation
Quadro FX Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
MXM-A (3.0)
Clock Speeds
1600 MHz
Base Clock
-
1950 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1937 MHz
Memory Clock
790 MHz
Memory
6GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR3
96bit
Memory Bus
128bit
186.0GB/s
Bandwidth
25.28GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
SM Count
6
1024
Shading Units
48
64
TMUs
16
32
ROPs
8
-
-
-
8
RT Cores
-
-
-
-
4 MB
L2 Cache
64 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
62.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
4.400 GPixel/s
124.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
8.800 GTexel/s
7.987 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
3.994 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
116.2 GFLOPS
-
-
-
Board Design
75W
TDP
35W
250 W
Suggested PSU
-
1x HDMI 2.1
3x DisplayPort 2.0
Outputs
No outputs
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
DG2-128
GPU Name
GT216
ACM-G11
GPU Variant
N10P-GLM
Generation 12.7
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
6 nm
Process Size
40 nm
7.2 billion
Transistors
0.486 billion
157 mm²
Die Size
100 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.2
6.6
Shader Model
4.1
