Intel Data Center GPU Flex 140 vs NVIDIA Quadro K2200M
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 6GB VRAM Data Center GPU Flex 140 and 2GB VRAM Quadro K2200M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Intel Data Center GPU Flex 140 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 1 months late
Boost Clock1950MHz
More VRAM (6GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (186.0GB/s vs 80.19GB/s)
384 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro K2200M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (65W vs 75W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Data Center GPU Flex 140
+367%
3.994 TFLOPS
Quadro K2200M
0.854 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Aug 2022
Release Date
Jul 2014
Data Center GPU
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
MXM-A (3.0)
Clock Speeds
1600 MHz
Base Clock
-
1950 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1937 MHz
Memory Clock
1253 MHz
Memory
6GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
96bit
Memory Bus
128bit
186.0GB/s
Bandwidth
80.19GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
-
-
1024
Shading Units
640
64
TMUs
40
32
ROPs
16
-
-
-
8
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SMM)
4 MB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
62.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
10.67 GPixel/s
124.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
26.68 GTexel/s
7.987 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
3.994 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
853.8 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
26.68 GFLOPS
Board Design
75W
TDP
65W
250 W
Suggested PSU
-
1x HDMI 2.1
3x DisplayPort 2.0
Outputs
No outputs
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
DG2-128
GPU Name
GM107
ACM-G11
GPU Variant
-
Generation 12.7
Architecture
Maxwell
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
6 nm
Process Size
28 nm
7.2 billion
Transistors
1.87 billion
157 mm²
Die Size
148 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
5.0
6.6
Shader Model
5.1
