NVIDIA CMP 30HX vs Moore Threads MTT S3000
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 6GB VRAM CMP 30HX and 32GB VRAM Moore Threads MTT S3000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA CMP 30HX 's Advantages
Boost Clock1785MHz
Lower TDP (125W vs 250W)
Moore Threads MTT S3000 's Advantages
More VRAM (32GB vs 6GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (448.0GB/s vs 336.0GB/s)
2688 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
CMP 30HX
5.027 TFLOPS
Moore Threads MTT S3000
+209%
15.56 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Feb 2021
Release Date
Unknown
Mining GPUs
Generation
MUSA-Chunxiao
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x4
Bus Interface
PCIe 5.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1530 MHz
Base Clock
1900 MHz
1785 MHz
Boost Clock
0 MHz
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz
Memory
6GB
Memory Size
32GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR6
192bit
Memory Bus
256bit
336.0GB/s
Bandwidth
448.0GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
32
22
SM Count
-
1408
Shading Units
4096
88
TMUs
256
48
ROPs
256
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
1536 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
85.68 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
486.4 GPixel/s
157.1 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
486.4 GTexel/s
10.05 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
31.13 TFLOPS
5.027 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
15.56 TFLOPS
157.1 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
243.2 GFLOPS
Board Design
125W
TDP
250W
300 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
No outputs
Outputs
2x DisplayPort 1.4a
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
TU116
GPU Name
MTT Gen 2
TU116-100-A1
GPU Variant
-
Turing
Architecture
MUSA-Chunxiao
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
12 nm
6.6 billion
Transistors
22 billion
284 mm²
Die Size
Unknown
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.4
7.5
CUDA
-
6.8
Shader Model
6.5
