NVIDIA CMP 30HX vs Moore Threads MTT S1000M
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 6GB VRAM CMP 30HX and 4GB VRAM Moore Threads MTT S1000M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA CMP 30HX 's Advantages
Boost Clock1785MHz
More VRAM (6GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (336.0GB/s vs 224.0GB/s)
384 additional rendering cores
Moore Threads MTT S1000M 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 5 months late
Lower TDP (35W vs 125W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
CMP 30HX
+145%
5.027 TFLOPS
Moore Threads MTT S1000M
2.048 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Feb 2021
Release Date
Jul 2022
Mining GPUs
Generation
MUSA-Chunxiao
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x4
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8
Clock Speeds
1530 MHz
Base Clock
1000 MHz
1785 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz
Memory
6GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR6
192bit
Memory Bus
128bit
336.0GB/s
Bandwidth
224.0GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
8
22
SM Count
-
1408
Shading Units
1024
88
TMUs
64
48
ROPs
64
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
1536 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
85.68 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
64.00 GPixel/s
157.1 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
64.00 GTexel/s
10.05 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
4.096 TFLOPS
5.027 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.048 TFLOPS
157.1 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
32.00 GFLOPS
Board Design
125W
TDP
35W
300 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
No outputs
Outputs
2x DisplayPort 1.2
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
TU116
GPU Name
MTT Gen 1
TU116-100-A1
GPU Variant
-
Turing
Architecture
MUSA-Chunxiao
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
12 nm
6.6 billion
Transistors
Unknown
284 mm²
Die Size
Unknown
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.4
7.5
CUDA
-
6.8
Shader Model
6.5
