NVIDIA CMP 170HX vs NVIDIA RTX 6000 Ada Generation
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM CMP 170HX and 48GB VRAM RTX 6000 Ada Generation to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA CMP 170HX 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1493GB/s vs 960.0GB/s)
Lower TDP (250W vs 300W)
NVIDIA RTX 6000 Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 3 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 78% (2505MHz vs 1410MHz)
More VRAM (48GB vs 16GB)
13696 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
CMP 170HX
12.63 TFLOPS
RTX 6000 Ada Generation
+620%
91.06 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Sep 2021
Release Date
Dec 2022
Mining GPUs
Generation
Quadro Ada
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x4
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1140 MHz
Base Clock
915 MHz
1410 MHz
Boost Clock
2505 MHz
1458 MHz
Memory Clock
2500 MHz
Memory
16GB
Memory Size
48GB
HBM2e
Memory Type
GDDR6
4096bit
Memory Bus
384bit
1493GB/s
Bandwidth
960.0GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
70
SM Count
142
4480
Shading Units
18176
280
TMUs
568
128
ROPs
192
280
Tensor Cores
568
-
RT Cores
142
192 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
8 MB
L2 Cache
96 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
180.5 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
481.0 GPixel/s
394.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
1423 GTexel/s
50.53 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
91.06 TFLOPS
12.63 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
91.06 TFLOPS
6.317 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
1423 GFLOPS
Board Design
250W
TDP
300W
600 W
Suggested PSU
700 W
No outputs
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 16-pin
Graphics Processor
GA100
GPU Name
AD102
GA100-105F-A1
GPU Variant
AD102
Ampere
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
7 nm
Process Size
5 nm
54.2 billion
Transistors
76.3 billion
826 mm²
Die Size
609 mm²
Graphics Features
N/A
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
N/A
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
8.0
CUDA
8.9
N/A
Shader Model
6.8
