Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA CMP 170HX vs AMD Radeon Pro W6900X

NVIDIA CMP 170HX vs AMD Radeon Pro W6900X

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM CMP 170HX and 32GB VRAM Radeon Pro W6900X to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA CMP 170HX 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1493GB/s vs 512.0GB/s)
Lower TDP (250W vs 300W)
AMD Radeon Pro W6900X 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 52% (2150MHz vs 1410MHz)
More VRAM (32GB vs 16GB)
640 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
CMP 170HX
12.63 TFLOPS
Radeon Pro W6900X +74%
22.02 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Sep 2021
Release Date
Aug 2021
Mining GPUs
Generation
Radeon Pro Mac
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x4
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1140 MHz
Base Clock
1825 MHz
1410 MHz
Boost Clock
2150 MHz
1458 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
32GB
HBM2e
Memory Type
GDDR6
4096bit
Memory Bus
256bit
1493GB/s
Bandwidth
512.0GB/s

Render Config

70
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
80
4480
Shading Units
5120
280
TMUs
320
128
ROPs
128
280
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
80
192 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
128 KB per Array
8 MB
L2 Cache
4 MB

Theoretical Performance

180.5 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
275.2 GPixel/s
394.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
688.0 GTexel/s
50.53 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
44.03 TFLOPS
12.63 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
22.02 TFLOPS
6.317 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
1376 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GA100
GPU Name
Navi 21
GA100-105F-A1
GPU Variant
Navi 21 Pro-XTA
Ampere
Architecture
RDNA 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
7 nm
Process Size
7 nm
54.2 billion
Transistors
26.8 billion
826 mm²
Die Size
520 mm²

Board Design

250W
TDP
300W
600 W
Suggested PSU
700 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.1 4x Thunderbolt
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

N/A
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
N/A
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.1
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
8.0
CUDA
-
N/A
Shader Model
6.5

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy