Home GPU Comparison Intel Arctic Sound-M vs NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Mobile

Intel Arctic Sound-M vs NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Mobile

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 16GB VRAM Arctic Sound M and 4GB VRAM Quadro T2000 Mobile to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Intel Arctic Sound-M 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 8 months late
More VRAM (16GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1229GB/s vs 128.1GB/s)
7168 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Mobile 's Advantages
Boost Clock1785MHz
Lower TDP (60W vs 500W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Arctic Sound M +303%
14.75 TFLOPS
Quadro T2000 Mobile
3.656 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2022
Release Date
May 2019
Data Center GPU
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1575 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1785 MHz
1200 MHz
Memory Clock
2001 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
4GB
HBM2e
Memory Type
GDDR5
4096bit
Memory Bus
128bit
1229GB/s
Bandwidth
128.1GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
16
-
Compute Units
-
8192
Shading Units
1024
256
TMUs
64
128
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
8 MB
L2 Cache
1024 KB

Theoretical Performance

115.2 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
57.12 GPixel/s
230.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
114.2 GTexel/s
29.49 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
7.311 TFLOPS
14.75 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.656 TFLOPS
3.686 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
114.2 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

Arctic Sound
GPU Name
TU117
-
GPU Variant
-
Generation 12.5
Architecture
Turing
Intel
Foundry
TSMC
10 nm
Process Size
12 nm
8 billion
Transistors
4.7 billion
190 mm²
Die Size
200 mm²

Board Design

500W
TDP
60W
900 W
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
8-pin EPS
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
7.5
6.6
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy