Intel Arctic Sound 1T vs Intel Data Center GPU Max Subsystem
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 16GB VRAM Arctic Sound 1T and 128GB VRAM Data Center GPU Max Subsystem to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Intel Arctic Sound 1T 's Advantages
Lower TDP (350W vs 2400W)
Intel Data Center GPU Max Subsystem 's Advantages
Released 2 years late
Boost Clock1600MHz
More VRAM (128GB vs 16GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (3205GB/s vs 1229GB/s)
10240 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Arctic Sound 1T
11.06 TFLOPS
Data Center GPU Max Subsystem
+374%
52.43 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jan 2021
Release Date
Jan 2023
Xe Graphics
Generation
Data Center GPU
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 5.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
900 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1600 MHz
1200 MHz
Memory Clock
1565 MHz
Memory
16GB
Memory Size
128GB
HBM2e
Memory Type
HBM2e
4096bit
Memory Bus
8192bit
1229GB/s
Bandwidth
3205GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
-
-
6144
Shading Units
16384
192
TMUs
1024
96
ROPs
0
-
Tensor Cores
1024
-
RT Cores
128
-
L1 Cache
64 KB (per EU)
8 MB
L2 Cache
408 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
86.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
0 MPixel/s
172.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
1638 GTexel/s
22.12 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
52.43 TFLOPS
11.06 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
52.43 TFLOPS
2.765 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
52.43 TFLOPS
Board Design
350W
TDP
2400W
750 W
Suggested PSU
2800 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
1x 16-pin
Graphics Processor
Arctic Sound
GPU Name
Ponte Vecchio
-
-
-
Generation 12.5
Architecture
Generation 12.5
Intel
Foundry
Intel
10 nm
Process Size
10 nm
8 billion
Transistors
100 billion
190 mm²
Die Size
1280 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
6.5
Shader Model
6.6
