Home GPU Comparison Intel Arc Pro A50 vs NVIDIA NVS 810

Intel Arc Pro A50 vs NVIDIA NVS 810

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 6GB VRAM Arc Pro A50 and 2GB VRAM NVS 810 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Intel Arc Pro A50 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 127% (2350MHz vs 1033MHz)
More VRAM (6GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.0GB/s vs 14.40GB/s)
512 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA NVS 810 's Advantages
Lower TDP (68W vs 75W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Arc Pro A50 +354%
4.813 TFLOPS
NVS 810
1.058 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2022
Release Date
Nov 2015
Alchemist
Generation
NVS
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

2000 MHz
Base Clock
902 MHz
2350 MHz
Boost Clock
1033 MHz
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz

Memory

6GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
DDR3
96bit
Memory Bus
64bit
192.0GB/s
Bandwidth
14.40GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
-
1024
Shading Units
512
64
TMUs
32
32
ROPs
16
-
Tensor Cores
-
8
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SMM)
4 MB
L2 Cache
1024 KB

Theoretical Performance

75.20 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
16.53 GPixel/s
150.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
33.06 GTexel/s
9.626 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
4.813 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1058 GFLOPS
1203 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
33.06 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

DG2-128
GPU Name
GM107
ACM-G11
GPU Variant
-
Generation 12.7
Architecture
Maxwell
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
6 nm
Process Size
28 nm
7.2 billion
Transistors
1.87 billion
157 mm²
Die Size
148 mm²

Board Design

75W
TDP
68W
250 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
4x mini-DisplayPort 2.0
Outputs
8x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
5.0
6.6
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy