Intel Arc Graphics 32EU vs NVIDIA Jetson Nano GPU
We compared two Integrated graphics card GPUs: 0System Shared VRAM Arc Graphics 32EU and 0System Shared VRAM Jetson Nano GPU to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Intel Arc Graphics 32EU 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 112% (1950MHz vs 921MHz)
128 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Jetson Nano GPU 's Advantages
Lower TDP (10W vs 65W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Arc Graphics 32EU
+322%
0.998 TFLOPS
Jetson Nano GPU
0.236 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Oct 2024
Release Date
May 2019
HD Graphics
Generation
Tegra
Integrated
Type
Integrated
Ring Bus
Bus Interface
IGP
Clock Speeds
300 MHz
Base Clock
640 MHz
1950 MHz
Boost Clock
921 MHz
System Shared
Memory Clock
System Shared
Memory
System Shared
Memory Size
System Shared
System Shared
Memory Type
System Shared
System Shared
Memory Bus
System Shared
System Dependent
Bandwidth
System Dependent
Render Config
-
-
-
-
-
-
256
Shading Units
128
16
TMUs
16
8
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SMM)
-
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
15.60 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
14.74 GPixel/s
31.20 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
14.74 GTexel/s
1.997 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
471.6 GFLOPS
998.4 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
235.8 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
7.368 GFLOPS
Board Design
65W
TDP
10W
-
-
-
Motherboard Dependent
Outputs
No outputs
-
-
-
Graphics Processor
Arrow Lake
GPU Name
GM20B
-
GPU Variant
TM660M-A2
Xe2-LPG
Architecture
Maxwell 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
3 nm
Process Size
20 nm
17.8 billion
Transistors
2 billion
243 mm²
Die Size
118 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.2
1.3
Vulkan
1.1
-
CUDA
5.3
6.8
Shader Model
6.4
