Intel Arc Graphics 32EU vs Intel Arc 140T Mobile
We compared two Integrated graphics card GPUs: 0System Shared VRAM Arc Graphics 32EU and 0System Shared VRAM Arc 140T Mobile to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Intel Arc 140T Mobile 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 21% (2350MHz vs 1950MHz)
768 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (35W vs 65W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Arc Graphics 32EU
0.998 TFLOPS
Arc 140T Mobile
+382%
4.813 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Oct 2024
Release Date
Jan 2025
HD Graphics
Generation
Arc Graphics-M
Integrated
Type
Integrated
Ring Bus
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8
Clock Speeds
300 MHz
Base Clock
300 MHz
1950 MHz
Boost Clock
2350 MHz
System Shared
Memory Clock
System Shared
Memory
System Shared
Memory Size
System Shared
System Shared
Memory Type
System Shared
System Shared
Memory Bus
System Shared
System Dependent
Bandwidth
System Dependent
Render Config
-
-
-
-
-
-
256
Shading Units
1024
16
TMUs
64
8
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
128
-
RT Cores
8
-
-
-
-
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
15.60 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
75.20 GPixel/s
31.20 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
150.4 GTexel/s
1.997 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
9.626 TFLOPS
998.4 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
4.813 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
1203 GFLOPS
Board Design
65W
TDP
35W
-
-
-
Motherboard Dependent
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
-
-
-
Graphics Processor
Arrow Lake
GPU Name
Arrow Lake
-
-
-
Xe2-LPG
Architecture
Xe2-LPG
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
3 nm
Process Size
3 nm
17.8 billion
Transistors
Unknown
243 mm²
Die Size
Unknown
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
-
-
-
6.8
Shader Model
6.8
