Intel Arc A370M vs NVIDIA GeForce MX330
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Arc A370M and 2GB VRAM GeForce MX330 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Intel Arc A370M 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 1 months late
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (112.0GB/s vs 56.06GB/s)
640 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce MX330 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 3% (1594MHz vs 1550MHz)
Lower TDP (10W vs 35W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Arc A370M
+159%
3.174 TFLOPS
GeForce MX330
1.224 TFLOPS
3DMark Time Spy
Arc A370M
+224%
3440
GeForce MX330
1060
3DMark Time Spy Extreme
Arc A370M
+1169%
1599
GeForce MX330
126
Graphics Card
Mar 2022
Release Date
Feb 2020
Alchemist
Generation
GeForce MX
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x4
Clock Speeds
300 MHz
Base Clock
1531 MHz
1550 MHz
Boost Clock
1594 MHz
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
1752 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
64bit
Memory Bus
64bit
112.0GB/s
Bandwidth
56.06GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
SM Count
3
1024
Shading Units
384
64
TMUs
24
32
ROPs
16
-
-
-
8
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SM)
4 MB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
49.60 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
25.50 GPixel/s
99.20 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
38.26 GTexel/s
6.349 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
19.13 GFLOPS
3.174 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1224 GFLOPS
793.6 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
38.26 GFLOPS
Board Design
35W
TDP
10W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
DG2-128
GPU Name
GP108
ACM-G11
GPU Variant
GP108-655-A1
(N17S-G3-A1)
Generation 12.7
Architecture
Pascal
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
6 nm
Process Size
14 nm
7.2 billion
Transistors
1.8 billion
157 mm²
Die Size
74 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
6.1
6.6
Shader Model
6.4
