NVIDIA A2 vs Intel Arc A350
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM A2 and 4GB VRAM Arc A350 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA A2 's Advantages
More VRAM (16GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (200.1GB/s vs 124.0GB/s)
512 additional rendering cores
Intel Arc A350 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 13% (2000MHz vs 1770MHz)
Lower TDP (25W vs 60W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
A2
+47%
4.531 TFLOPS
Arc A350
3.072 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Nov 2021
Release Date
Jan 2022
Quadro
Generation
Alchemist(Arc 3)
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8
Clock Speeds
1440 MHz
Base Clock
2000 MHz
1770 MHz
Boost Clock
2000 MHz
1563 MHz
Memory Clock
1937 MHz
Memory
16GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
64bit
200.1GB/s
Bandwidth
124.0GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
10
SM Count
-
1280
Shading Units
768
40
TMUs
48
32
ROPs
24
40
Tensor Cores
96
10
RT Cores
6
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
2 MB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
56.64 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
48.00 GPixel/s
70.80 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
96.00 GTexel/s
4.531 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
6.144 TFLOPS
4.531 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.072 TFLOPS
70.80 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
768.0 GFLOPS
Board Design
60W
TDP
25W
250 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
GA107
GPU Name
DG2-128
-
GPU Variant
ACM-G11
Ampere
Architecture
Generation 12.7
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
8 nm
Process Size
6 nm
Unknown
Transistors
7.2 billion
Unknown
Die Size
157 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
8.6
CUDA
-
6.6
Shader Model
6.6
