ATI 3D Rage IIC PCI vs NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2MB VRAM 3D Rage IIC PCI and 16GB VRAM RTX 2000 Ada Generation to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 26 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock2130MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (256.0GB/s vs 0.664GB/s)
2816 additional rendering cores
Score
Graphics Card
Apr 1997
Release Date
Feb 2024
Rage 2
Generation
Quadro Ada
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCI
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1620 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2130 MHz
83 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz
Memory
2MB
Memory Size
16GB
SDR
Memory Type
GDDR6
64bit
Memory Bus
128bit
0.664GB/s
Bandwidth
256.0GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
SM Count
22
-
Shading Units
2816
1
TMUs
88
1
ROPs
48
-
Tensor Cores
88
-
RT Cores
22
-
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
-
L2 Cache
12 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
60.00 MPixel/s
Pixel Rate
102.2 GPixel/s
60.00 MTexel/s
Texture Rate
187.4 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
12.00 TFLOPS
-
FP32 (float)
12.00 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
187.4 GFLOPS
Board Design
Unknown
TDP
70W
200 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x VGA
Outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
-
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
Rage IIC
GPU Name
AD107
Rage IIC PCI
(215R2PZUA21)
GPU Variant
-
Rage 2
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
UMC
Foundry
TSMC
500 nm
Process Size
5 nm
0.005 billion
Transistors
18.9 billion
39 mm²
Die Size
159 mm²
Graphics Features
5.0
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
N/A
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
8.9
-
Shader Model
6.7
