Home GPU Comparison ATI 3D Rage IIC PCI vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 GDDR6

ATI 3D Rage IIC PCI vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 GDDR6

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2MB VRAM 3D Rage IIC PCI and 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1650 GDDR6 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 GDDR6 's Advantages
Released 23 years late
Boost Clock1590MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.0GB/s vs 0.664GB/s)
896 additional rendering cores

Score

Graphics Card

Apr 1997
Release Date
Apr 2020
Rage 2
Generation
GeForce 16
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCI
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1410 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1590 MHz
83 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz

Memory

2MB
Memory Size
4GB
SDR
Memory Type
GDDR6
64bit
Memory Bus
128bit
0.664GB/s
Bandwidth
192.0GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
SM Count
14
-
Shading Units
896
1
TMUs
56
1
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
-
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

60.00 MPixel/s
Pixel Rate
50.88 GPixel/s
60.00 MTexel/s
Texture Rate
89.04 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
5.699 TFLOPS
-
FP32 (float)
2.849 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
89.04 GFLOPS

Board Design

Unknown
TDP
75W
200 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x VGA
Outputs
1x DVI 1x HDMI 2.0 1x DisplayPort 1.4a
-
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Rage IIC
GPU Name
TU117
Rage IIC PCI (215R2PZUA21)
GPU Variant
TU117-300-A1
Rage 2
Architecture
Turing
UMC
Foundry
TSMC
500 nm
Process Size
12 nm
0.005 billion
Transistors
4.7 billion
39 mm²
Die Size
200 mm²

Graphics Features

5.0
DirectX
12 (12_1)
N/A
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
7.5
-
Shader Model
6.6
© 2025 - TopCPU.net