ATI 3D Rage IIC PCI vs AMD FireStream 9350
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2MB VRAM 3D Rage IIC PCI and 2GB VRAM FireStream 9350 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
AMD FireStream 9350 's Advantages
Released 13 years and 2 months late
Larger VRAM bandwidth (128.0GB/s vs 0.664GB/s)
1440 additional rendering cores
Score
Graphics Card
Apr 1997
Release Date
Jun 2010
Rage 2
Generation
FireStream
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCI
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
83 MHz
Memory Clock
1000 MHz
Memory
2MB
Memory Size
2GB
SDR
Memory Type
GDDR5
64bit
Memory Bus
256bit
0.664GB/s
Bandwidth
128.0GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
18
-
-
-
-
Shading Units
1440
1
TMUs
72
1
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
8 KB (per CU)
-
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
60.00 MPixel/s
Pixel Rate
22.40 GPixel/s
60.00 MTexel/s
Texture Rate
50.40 GTexel/s
-
-
-
-
FP32 (float)
2.016 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
403.2 GFLOPS
Board Design
Unknown
TDP
150W
200 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x VGA
Outputs
1x DisplayPort 1.1
-
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
Rage IIC
GPU Name
Cypress
Rage IIC PCI
(215R2PZUA21)
GPU Variant
Cypress PRO GL
Rage 2
Architecture
TeraScale 2
UMC
Foundry
TSMC
500 nm
Process Size
40 nm
0.005 billion
Transistors
2.154 billion
39 mm²
Die Size
334 mm²
Graphics Features
5.0
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
N/A
OpenGL
4.4
N/A
OpenCL
1.2
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
-
Shader Model
5.0
