ATI 3D Rage IIC PCI vs NVIDIA GeForce 9400 GT
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2MB VRAM 3D Rage IIC PCI and 1 GB VRAM GeForce 9400 GT to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
ATI 3D Rage IIC PCI 's Advantages
More VRAM (2GB vs 1GB)
NVIDIA GeForce 9400 GT 's Advantages
Released 11 years and 4 months late
Larger VRAM bandwidth (9.600GB/s vs 0.664GB/s)
16 additional rendering cores
Score
Graphics Card
Apr 1997
Release Date
Aug 2008
Rage 2
Generation
GeForce 9
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCI
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
83 MHz
Memory Clock
600 MHz
Memory
2MB
Memory Size
1 GB
SDR
Memory Type
DDR2
64bit
Memory Bus
64bit
0.664GB/s
Bandwidth
9.600GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
SM Count
2
-
Shading Units
16
1
TMUs
8
1
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L2 Cache
16 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
60.00 MPixel/s
Pixel Rate
1.836 GPixel/s
60.00 MTexel/s
Texture Rate
3.672 GTexel/s
-
-
-
-
FP32 (float)
29.38 GFLOPS
-
-
-
Board Design
Unknown
TDP
50W
200 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x VGA
Outputs
1x DVI
1x VGA
1x S-Video
-
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
Rage IIC
GPU Name
G86S
Rage IIC PCI
(215R2PZUA21)
GPU Variant
-
Rage 2
Architecture
Tesla
UMC
Foundry
TSMC
500 nm
Process Size
80 nm
0.005 billion
Transistors
0.21 billion
39 mm²
Die Size
127 mm²
Graphics Features
5.0
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
N/A
OpenGL
3.3
N/A
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.1
-
Shader Model
4.0
