ATI 3D Rage IIC PCI vs AMD FireStream 9250
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2MB VRAM 3D Rage IIC PCI and 1024MB VRAM FireStream 9250 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
AMD FireStream 9250 's Advantages
Released 11 years and 2 months late
More VRAM (1024GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (63.55GB/s vs 0.664GB/s)
800 additional rendering cores
Score
Graphics Card
Apr 1997
Release Date
Jun 2008
Rage 2
Generation
FireStream
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCI
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
83 MHz
Memory Clock
993 MHz
Memory
2MB
Memory Size
1024MB
SDR
Memory Type
GDDR3
64bit
Memory Bus
256bit
0.664GB/s
Bandwidth
63.55GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
10
-
-
-
-
Shading Units
800
1
TMUs
40
1
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
-
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
60.00 MPixel/s
Pixel Rate
10.00 GPixel/s
60.00 MTexel/s
Texture Rate
25.00 GTexel/s
-
-
-
-
FP32 (float)
1000 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
200.0 GFLOPS
Board Design
Unknown
TDP
150W
200 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x VGA
Outputs
1x DVI
-
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
Rage IIC
GPU Name
RV770
Rage IIC PCI
(215R2PZUA21)
GPU Variant
RV770 PRO
Rage 2
Architecture
TeraScale
UMC
Foundry
TSMC
500 nm
Process Size
55 nm
0.005 billion
Transistors
0.956 billion
39 mm²
Die Size
256 mm²
Graphics Features
5.0
DirectX
10.1 (10_1)
N/A
OpenGL
3.3
N/A
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
-
Shader Model
4.1
