Tesla C2075 vs Quadro 5000
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 6GB VRAM Tesla C2075 and 0GB VRAM Quadro 5000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Tesla C2075 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (150.3GB/s vs 120.0GB/s)
96 additional rendering cores
Quadro 5000 's Advantages
Lower TDP (152W vs 247W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Tesla C2075
+42%
1028
Quadro 5000
722
Graphics Card
Jul 2011
Release Date
Feb 2011
Tesla
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
783 MHz
Memory Clock
750 MHz
Memory
6GB
Memory Size
GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
384bit
Memory Bus
320bit
150.3GB/s
Bandwidth
120.0GB/s
Render Config
14
SM Count
11
448
Shading Units
352
56
TMUs
44
48
ROPs
40
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
768 KB
L2 Cache
640 KB
Theoretical Performance
16.07 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
11.29 GPixel/s
32.14 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
22.57 GTexel/s
1028 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
722.3 GFLOPS
513.9 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
361.2 GFLOPS
Board Design
247W
TDP
152W
550 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x DVI
Outputs
1x DVI
2x DisplayPort
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
GF110
GPU Name
GF100
GF110-351-A1
GPU Variant
GF100-850-A3
Fermi 2.0
Architecture
Fermi
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
40 nm
3 billion
Transistors
3.1 billion
520 mm²
Die Size
529 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
2.0
CUDA
2.0
5.1
Shader Model
5.1
