Tesla C2075 vs Arctic Sound 1T
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 6GB VRAM Tesla C2075 and 16GB VRAM Arctic Sound 1T to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Tesla C2075 's Advantages
Lower TDP (247W vs 350W)
Arctic Sound 1T 's Advantages
Released 9 years and 6 months late
More VRAM (16GB vs 6GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1229GB/s vs 150.3GB/s)
5696 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Tesla C2075
1028
Arctic Sound 1T
+975%
11060
Graphics Card
Jul 2011
Release Date
Jan 2021
Tesla
Generation
Xe Graphics
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
783 MHz
Memory Clock
1200 MHz
Memory
6GB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
HBM2e
384bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
150.3GB/s
Bandwidth
1229GB/s
Render Config
14
SM Count
-
448
Shading Units
6144
56
TMUs
192
48
ROPs
96
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
768 KB
L2 Cache
8 MB
Theoretical Performance
16.07 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
86.40 GPixel/s
32.14 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
172.8 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
22.12 TFLOPS
1028 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
11.06 TFLOPS
513.9 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
2.765 TFLOPS
Board Design
247W
TDP
350W
550 W
Suggested PSU
750 W
1x DVI
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GF110
GPU Name
Arctic Sound
GF110-351-A1
GPU Variant
-
Fermi 2.0
Architecture
Generation 12.5
TSMC
Foundry
Intel
40 nm
Process Size
10 nm
3 billion
Transistors
8 billion
520 mm²
Die Size
190 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
2.0
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
6.5
