Tesla C2075 vs Quadro K620M
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 6GB VRAM Tesla C2075 and 2GB VRAM Quadro K620M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Tesla C2075 's Advantages
More VRAM (6GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (150.3GB/s vs 14.40GB/s)
64 additional rendering cores
Quadro K620M 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock1124MHz
Lower TDP (30W vs 247W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Tesla C2075
+19%
1028
Quadro K620M
863
Graphics Card
Jul 2011
Release Date
Mar 2015
Tesla
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-A (3.0)
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1029 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1124 MHz
783 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz
Memory
6GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
DDR3
384bit
Memory Bus
64bit
150.3GB/s
Bandwidth
14.40GB/s
Render Config
14
SM Count
-
448
Shading Units
384
56
TMUs
16
48
ROPs
8
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SMM)
768 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
Theoretical Performance
16.07 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
8.992 GPixel/s
32.14 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
17.98 GTexel/s
1028 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
863.2 GFLOPS
513.9 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
26.98 GFLOPS
Board Design
247W
TDP
30W
550 W
Suggested PSU
-
1x DVI
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GF110
GPU Name
GM108
GF110-351-A1
GPU Variant
N15M-Q3
Fermi 2.0
Architecture
Maxwell
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
28 nm
3 billion
Transistors
Unknown
520 mm²
Die Size
Unknown
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
2.0
CUDA
5.0
5.1
Shader Model
5.1
