Radeon R9 270 1024SP vs FirePro W7100
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM Radeon R9 270 1024SP and 8GB VRAM FirePro W7100 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Radeon R9 270 1024SP 's Advantages
Released 7 months late
Boost Clock925MHz
FirePro W7100 's Advantages
More VRAM (8GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (160.0GB/s vs 153.6GB/s)
768 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 270 1024SP
1894
FirePro W7100
+74%
3297
Graphics Card
Mar 2015
Release Date
Aug 2014
Volcanic Islands
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
900 MHz
Base Clock
-
925 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1200 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
153.6GB/s
Bandwidth
160.0GB/s
Render Config
16
Compute Units
28
1024
Shading Units
1792
64
TMUs
112
32
ROPs
32
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
512 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
Theoretical Performance
29.60 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
29.44 GPixel/s
59.20 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
103.0 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
3.297 TFLOPS
1.894 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.297 TFLOPS
118.4 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
206.1 GFLOPS
Board Design
150W
TDP
150W
450 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
2x DVI
1x HDMI 1.4a
1x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 1.2
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
Pitcairn
GPU Name
Tonga
Pitcairn PRO
(215-0828062)
GPU Variant
Tonga PRO GL
GCN 1.0
Architecture
GCN 3.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
2.8 billion
Transistors
5 billion
212 mm²
Die Size
366 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
2.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.2
5.1
Shader Model
6.3
