Radeon R7 360 vs Radeon RX 6950 XT
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM Radeon R7 360 and 16GB VRAM Radeon RX 6950 XT to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Radeon R7 360 's Advantages
Lower TDP (100W vs 335W)
Radeon RX 6950 XT 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 120% (2310MHz vs 1050MHz)
More VRAM (16GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (576.0GB/s vs 96.00GB/s)
4352 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Radeon R7 360
1613
Radeon RX 6950 XT
+1366%
23650
3DMark Time Spy
Radeon R7 360
1371
Radeon RX 6950 XT
+1470%
21537
3DMark Time Spy Extreme
Radeon R7 360
517
Radeon RX 6950 XT
+1939%
10545
Graphics Card
Jun 2015
Release Date
May 2022
Pirate Islands
Generation
Navi II
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1000 MHz
Base Clock
1860 MHz
1050 MHz
Boost Clock
2310 MHz
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
2250 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
96.00GB/s
Bandwidth
576.0GB/s
Render Config
12
Compute Units
80
768
Shading Units
5120
48
TMUs
320
16
ROPs
128
-
RT Cores
80
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
128 KB per Array
256 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
L3 Cache
128 MB
Theoretical Performance
16.80 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
295.7 GPixel/s
50.40 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
739.2 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
47.31 TFLOPS
1.613 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
23.65 TFLOPS
100.8 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
1478 GFLOPS
Board Design
100W
TDP
335W
300 W
Suggested PSU
700 W
1x DVI
1x HDMI 1.4a
1x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.1
2x DisplayPort 1.4a
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
Tobago
GPU Name
Navi 21
Tobago PRO
(215-0875010)
GPU Variant
Navi 21 KXTX
(215-121000289)
GCN 2.0
Architecture
RDNA 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
7 nm
2.08 billion
Transistors
26.8 billion
160 mm²
Die Size
520 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.0
OpenCL
2.1
1.2
Vulkan
1.3
6.3
Shader Model
6.5
