Radeon R7 360 vs Radeon RX 7950 XT
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM Radeon R7 360 and 20GB VRAM Radeon RX 7950 XT to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Radeon R7 360 's Advantages
Lower TDP (100W vs 300W)
Radeon RX 7950 XT 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 186% (3000MHz vs 1050MHz)
More VRAM (20GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (800.0GB/s vs 96.00GB/s)
4608 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Radeon R7 360
1613
Radeon RX 7950 XT
+3899%
64510
Graphics Card
Jun 2015
Release Date
Unknown
Pirate Islands
Generation
Navi III
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1000 MHz
Base Clock
2000 MHz
1050 MHz
Boost Clock
3000 MHz
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
2500 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
20GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
320bit
96.00GB/s
Bandwidth
800.0GB/s
Render Config
12
Compute Units
84
768
Shading Units
5376
48
TMUs
336
16
ROPs
192
-
RT Cores
84
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
256 KB per Array
256 KB
L2 Cache
6 MB
-
L3 Cache
80 MB
Theoretical Performance
16.80 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
576.0 GPixel/s
50.40 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
1008 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
129.0 TFLOPS
1.613 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
64.51 TFLOPS
100.8 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
2.016 TFLOPS
Board Design
100W
TDP
300W
300 W
Suggested PSU
700 W
1x DVI
1x HDMI 1.4a
1x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.1a
2x DisplayPort 2.1
1x USB Type-C
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
Tobago
GPU Name
Navi 31
Tobago PRO
(215-0875010)
GPU Variant
Navi 31 XT+
GCN 2.0
Architecture
RDNA 3.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
5 nm
2.08 billion
Transistors
57.7 billion
160 mm²
Die Size
529 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.0
OpenCL
2.2
1.2
Vulkan
1.3
6.3
Shader Model
6.7
