Radeon R7 360 vs Radeon Instinct MI325X
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM Radeon R7 360 and 288GB VRAM Radeon Instinct MI325X to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Radeon R7 360 's Advantages
Lower TDP (100W vs 1000W)
Radeon Instinct MI325X 's Advantages
Released 9 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 100% (2100MHz vs 1050MHz)
More VRAM (288GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (10.3TB/s vs 96.00GB/s)
18688 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Radeon R7 360
1613
Radeon Instinct MI325X
+4966%
81720
Graphics Card
Jun 2015
Release Date
Oct 2024
Pirate Islands
Generation
Radeon Instinct
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 5.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1000 MHz
Base Clock
1000 MHz
1050 MHz
Boost Clock
2100 MHz
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
2525 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
288GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
HBM3e
128bit
Memory Bus
8192bit
96.00GB/s
Bandwidth
10.3TB/s
Render Config
12
Compute Units
304
768
Shading Units
19456
48
TMUs
1216
16
ROPs
0
-
Tensor Cores
1216
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
256 KB
L2 Cache
16 MB
-
L3 Cache
256 MB
Theoretical Performance
16.80 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
0 MPixel/s
50.40 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
2553.6 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
653.7 TFLOPS
1.613 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
81.72 TFLOPS
100.8 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
81.72 TFLOPS
Board Design
100W
TDP
1000W
300 W
Suggested PSU
1400 W
1x DVI
1x HDMI 1.4a
1x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
Tobago
GPU Name
Aqua Vanjaram
Tobago PRO
(215-0875010)
GPU Variant
-
GCN 2.0
Architecture
CDNA 3.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
5 nm
2.08 billion
Transistors
153 billion
160 mm²
Die Size
1017 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_0)
DirectX
N/A
4.6
OpenGL
N/A
2.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
6.3
Shader Model
N/A
