Radeon R7 360 vs GeForce GTX 1650 TU106
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM Radeon R7 360 and 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1650 TU106 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
GeForce GTX 1650 TU106 's Advantages
Released 5 years late
Boost Clock has increased by 51% (1590MHz vs 1050MHz)
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.0GB/s vs 96.00GB/s)
128 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (90W vs 100W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Radeon R7 360
1613
GeForce GTX 1650 TU106
+76%
2849
Graphics Card
Jun 2015
Release Date
Jun 2020
Pirate Islands
Generation
GeForce 16
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1000 MHz
Base Clock
1410 MHz
1050 MHz
Boost Clock
1590 MHz
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
96.00GB/s
Bandwidth
192.0GB/s
Render Config
12
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
14
768
Shading Units
896
48
TMUs
56
16
ROPs
32
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
256 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
Theoretical Performance
16.80 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
50.88 GPixel/s
50.40 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
89.04 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
5.699 TFLOPS
1.613 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.849 TFLOPS
100.8 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
89.04 GFLOPS
Board Design
100W
TDP
90W
300 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x DVI
1x HDMI 1.4a
1x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x DVI
1x HDMI 2.0
1x DisplayPort 1.4a
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
Tobago
GPU Name
TU106
Tobago PRO
(215-0875010)
GPU Variant
TU106-125-KAB-A1
GCN 2.0
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
12 nm
2.08 billion
Transistors
10.8 billion
160 mm²
Die Size
445 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
7.5
6.3
Shader Model
6.6
