Radeon Instinct MI300X vs RTX A1000 Embedded
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 192GB VRAM Radeon Instinct MI300X and 4GB VRAM RTX A1000 Embedded to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Radeon Instinct MI300X 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 29% (2100MHz vs 1627MHz)
More VRAM (192GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (5171GB/s vs 224.0GB/s)
17408 additional rendering cores
RTX A1000 Embedded 's Advantages
Lower TDP (60W vs 750W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Radeon Instinct MI300X
+1126%
81720
RTX A1000 Embedded
6664
Graphics Card
Dec 2023
Release Date
Jan 2022
Radeon Instinct
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 5.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1000 MHz
Base Clock
1192 MHz
2100 MHz
Boost Clock
1627 MHz
2525 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz
Memory
192GB
Memory Size
4GB
HBM3
Memory Type
GDDR6
8192bit
Memory Bus
128bit
5171GB/s
Bandwidth
224.0GB/s
Render Config
304
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
16
19456
Shading Units
2048
1216
TMUs
64
0
ROPs
48
1216
Tensor Cores
64
-
RT Cores
16
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
16 MB
L2 Cache
2 MB
256 MB
L3 Cache
-
Theoretical Performance
0 MPixel/s
Pixel Rate
78.10 GPixel/s
2554 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
104.1 GTexel/s
653.7 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
6.664 TFLOPS
81.72 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
6.664 TFLOPS
81.72 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
104.1 GFLOPS
Board Design
750W
TDP
60W
1150 W
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
Aqua Vanjaram
GPU Name
GA107S
CDNA 3.0
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
5 nm
Process Size
8 nm
153 billion
Transistors
Unknown
1017 mm²
Die Size
Unknown
Graphics Features
N/A
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
N/A
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
8.6
N/A
Shader Model
6.6
