Home Comparison Radeon Instinct MI300X vs GRID M60 4A

Radeon Instinct MI300X vs GRID M60 4A

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 192GB VRAM Radeon Instinct MI300X and 4GB VRAM GRID M60 4A to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Radeon Instinct MI300X 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 78% (2100MHz vs 1178MHz)
More VRAM (192GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (5171GB/s vs 160.4GB/s)
17408 additional rendering cores
GRID M60 4A 's Advantages
Lower TDP (225W vs 750W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon Instinct MI300X +1593%
81720
GRID M60 4A
4825

Graphics Card

Dec 2023
Release Date
Aug 2015
Radeon Instinct
Generation
GRID
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 5.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1000 MHz
Base Clock
557 MHz
2100 MHz
Boost Clock
1178 MHz
2525 MHz
Memory Clock
1253 MHz

Memory

192GB
Memory Size
4GB
HBM3
Memory Type
GDDR5
8192bit
Memory Bus
256bit
5171GB/s
Bandwidth
160.4GB/s

Render Config

304
Compute Units
-
19456
Shading Units
2048
1216
TMUs
128
0
ROPs
64
1216
Tensor Cores
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SMM)
16 MB
L2 Cache
2 MB
256 MB
L3 Cache
-

Theoretical Performance

0 MPixel/s
Pixel Rate
75.39 GPixel/s
2554 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
150.8 GTexel/s
653.7 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
81.72 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
4.825 TFLOPS
81.72 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
150.8 GFLOPS

Board Design

750W
TDP
225W
1150 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

Aqua Vanjaram
GPU Name
GM204
CDNA 3.0
Architecture
Maxwell 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
28 nm
153 billion
Transistors
5.2 billion
1017 mm²
Die Size
398 mm²

Graphics Features

N/A
DirectX
12 (12_1)
N/A
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
5.2
N/A
Shader Model
6.4
© 2025 - TopCPU.net