Quadro P2000 vs Quadro K5100M
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 5GB VRAM Quadro P2000 and 8GB VRAM Quadro K5100M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Quadro P2000 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 92% (1480MHz vs 771MHz)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (140.2GB/s vs 115.2GB/s)
Lower TDP (75W vs 100W)
Quadro K5100M 's Advantages
More VRAM (8GB vs 5GB)
512 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro P2000
+27%
3031
Quadro K5100M
2369
3DMark Time Spy
Quadro P2000
+133%
2973
Quadro K5100M
1273
3DMark Time Spy Extreme
Quadro P2000
+166%
1350
Quadro K5100M
507
Graphics Card
Feb 2017
Release Date
Jul 2013
Quadro
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-B (3.0)
Clock Speeds
1076 MHz
Base Clock
771 MHz
1480 MHz
Boost Clock
771 MHz
1752 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz
Memory
5GB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
160bit
Memory Bus
256bit
140.2GB/s
Bandwidth
115.2GB/s
Render Config
8
SM Count
-
1024
Shading Units
1536
64
TMUs
128
40
ROPs
32
48 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
1280 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
Theoretical Performance
59.20 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
24.67 GPixel/s
94.72 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
98.69 GTexel/s
47.36 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
3.031 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.369 TFLOPS
94.72 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
98.69 GFLOPS
Board Design
75W
TDP
100W
250 W
Suggested PSU
-
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
GP106
GPU Name
GK104
GP106-875-A1
GPU Variant
N15E-Q5-A2
Pascal
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
16 nm
Process Size
28 nm
4.4 billion
Transistors
3.54 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
294 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.1
6.1
CUDA
3.0
6.4
Shader Model
5.1
