Quadro P2000 vs Quadro FX 4700 X2
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 5GB VRAM Quadro P2000 and 1024MB VRAM Quadro FX 4700 X2 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Quadro P2000 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock1480MHz
More VRAM (5GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (140.2GB/s vs 51.20GB/s)
896 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (75W vs 226W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro P2000
+689%
3031
Quadro FX 4700 X2
384
Graphics Card
Feb 2017
Release Date
Apr 2008
Quadro
Generation
Quadro FX
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1076 MHz
Base Clock
-
1480 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1752 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz
Memory
5GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
160bit
Memory Bus
256bit
140.2GB/s
Bandwidth
51.20GB/s
Render Config
8
SM Count
16
1024
Shading Units
128
64
TMUs
64
40
ROPs
16
48 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
1280 KB
L2 Cache
64 KB
Theoretical Performance
59.20 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
9.600 GPixel/s
94.72 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
38.40 GTexel/s
47.36 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
3.031 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
384.0 GFLOPS
94.72 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
75W
TDP
226W
250 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
2x DVI
1x S-Video
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
GP106
GPU Name
G92
GP106-875-A1
GPU Variant
G92-880-A2
Pascal
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
16 nm
Process Size
65 nm
4.4 billion
Transistors
0.754 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
324 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
6.1
CUDA
1.1
6.4
Shader Model
4.0
