Quadro P2000 vs Quadro 2000D
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 5GB VRAM Quadro P2000 and 1024MB VRAM Quadro 2000D to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Quadro P2000 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock1480MHz
More VRAM (5GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (140.2GB/s vs 41.60GB/s)
832 additional rendering cores
Quadro 2000D 's Advantages
Lower TDP (62W vs 75W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro P2000
+531%
3031
Quadro 2000D
480
Graphics Card
Feb 2017
Release Date
Oct 2011
Quadro
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1076 MHz
Base Clock
-
1480 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1752 MHz
Memory Clock
650 MHz
Memory
5GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
160bit
Memory Bus
128bit
140.2GB/s
Bandwidth
41.60GB/s
Render Config
8
SM Count
4
1024
Shading Units
192
64
TMUs
32
40
ROPs
16
48 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
1280 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
Theoretical Performance
59.20 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
5.000 GPixel/s
94.72 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
20.00 GTexel/s
47.36 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
3.031 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
480.0 GFLOPS
94.72 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
40.00 GFLOPS
Board Design
75W
TDP
62W
250 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
2x DVI
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GP106
GPU Name
GF106
GP106-875-A1
GPU Variant
GF106-875-KA-A1
Pascal
Architecture
Fermi
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
16 nm
Process Size
40 nm
4.4 billion
Transistors
1.17 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
238 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
6.1
CUDA
2.1
6.4
Shader Model
5.1
