Home Comparison Quadro P2000 vs AMD Instinct MI300A

Quadro P2000 vs AMD Instinct MI300A

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 5GB VRAM Quadro P2000 and 128GB VRAM AMD Instinct MI300A to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Quadro P2000 's Advantages
Lower TDP (75W vs 760W)
AMD Instinct MI300A 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 42% (2100MHz vs 1480MHz)
More VRAM (128GB vs 5GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (5300GB/s vs 140.2GB/s)
13568 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro P2000
3031
AMD Instinct MI300A +3944%
122600

Graphics Card

Feb 2017
Release Date
Dec 2023
Quadro
Generation
Instinct
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 5.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1076 MHz
Base Clock
1000 MHz
1480 MHz
Boost Clock
2100 MHz
1752 MHz
Memory Clock
5200 MHz

Memory

5GB
Memory Size
128GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
HBM3
160bit
Memory Bus
8192bit
140.2GB/s
Bandwidth
5300GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
228
8
SM Count
-
1024
Shading Units
14592
64
TMUs
880
40
ROPs
0
48 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
1280 KB
L2 Cache
16 MB

Theoretical Performance

59.20 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
0 MPixel/s
94.72 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
1496 GTexel/s
47.36 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
980.6 TFLOPS
3.031 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
122.6 TFLOPS
94.72 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
61.3 TFLOPS

Board Design

75W
TDP
760W
250 W
Suggested PSU
1000 W
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GP106
GPU Name
MI300
GP106-875-A1
GPU Variant
-
Pascal
Architecture
CDNA 3.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
16 nm
Process Size
5 nm
4.4 billion
Transistors
146 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
1017 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
N/A
4.6
OpenGL
N/A
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
6.1
CUDA
-
6.4
Shader Model
N/A
© 2025 - TopCPU.net