Quadro K5000 SYNC vs Tesla C2090
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro K5000 SYNC and 6GB VRAM Tesla C2090 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Quadro K5000 SYNC 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 6 months late
1024 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (122W vs 250W)
Tesla C2090 's Advantages
More VRAM (6GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (177.4GB/s vs 172.8GB/s)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro K5000 SYNC
+62%
2169
Tesla C2090
1332
Graphics Card
Jan 2013
Release Date
Jul 2011
Quadro
Generation
Tesla
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1350 MHz
Memory Clock
924 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
6GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
384bit
172.8GB/s
Bandwidth
177.4GB/s
Render Config
-
SM Count
16
1536
Shading Units
512
128
TMUs
64
32
ROPs
48
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
512 KB
L2 Cache
768 KB
Theoretical Performance
22.59 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
20.83 GPixel/s
90.37 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
41.66 GTexel/s
2.169 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1332 GFLOPS
90.37 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
666.1 GFLOPS
Board Design
122W
TDP
250W
300 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
2x DVI
2x DisplayPort 1.2
1x SDI
Outputs
No outputs
2x 6-pin
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
GK104
GPU Name
GF110
Kepler
Architecture
Fermi 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
40 nm
3.54 billion
Transistors
3 billion
294 mm²
Die Size
520 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.1
Vulkan
N/A
3.0
CUDA
2.0
5.1
Shader Model
5.1
