Quadro K5000 SYNC vs Data Center GPU Max Subsystem
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro K5000 SYNC and 128GB VRAM Data Center GPU Max Subsystem to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Quadro K5000 SYNC 's Advantages
Lower TDP (122W vs 2400W)
Data Center GPU Max Subsystem 's Advantages
Released 10 years late
Boost Clock1600MHz
More VRAM (128GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (3205GB/s vs 172.8GB/s)
14848 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro K5000 SYNC
2169
Data Center GPU Max Subsystem
+2317%
52430
Graphics Card
Jan 2013
Release Date
Jan 2023
Quadro
Generation
Data Center GPU
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 5.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
900 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1600 MHz
1350 MHz
Memory Clock
1565 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
128GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
HBM2e
256bit
Memory Bus
8192bit
172.8GB/s
Bandwidth
3205GB/s
Render Config
1536
Shading Units
16384
128
TMUs
1024
32
ROPs
0
-
Tensor Cores
1024
-
RT Cores
128
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per EU)
512 KB
L2 Cache
408 MB
Theoretical Performance
22.59 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
0 MPixel/s
90.37 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
1638 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
52.43 TFLOPS
2.169 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
52.43 TFLOPS
90.37 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
52.43 TFLOPS
Board Design
122W
TDP
2400W
300 W
Suggested PSU
2800 W
2x DVI
2x DisplayPort 1.2
1x SDI
Outputs
No outputs
2x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 16-pin
Graphics Processor
GK104
GPU Name
Ponte Vecchio
Kepler
Architecture
Generation 12.5
TSMC
Foundry
Intel
28 nm
Process Size
10 nm
3.54 billion
Transistors
100 billion
294 mm²
Die Size
1280 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.1
Vulkan
N/A
3.0
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
6.6
