Quadro K5000 SYNC vs Quadro M2000M
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro K5000 SYNC and 4GB VRAM Quadro M2000M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Quadro K5000 SYNC 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (172.8GB/s vs 80.19GB/s)
896 additional rendering cores
Quadro M2000M 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock1098MHz
Lower TDP (55W vs 122W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro K5000 SYNC
+54%
2169
Quadro M2000M
1405
Graphics Card
Jan 2013
Release Date
Dec 2015
Quadro
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-A (3.0)
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1029 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1098 MHz
1350 MHz
Memory Clock
1253 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
172.8GB/s
Bandwidth
80.19GB/s
Render Config
1536
Shading Units
640
128
TMUs
40
32
ROPs
16
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SMM)
512 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
Theoretical Performance
22.59 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
17.57 GPixel/s
90.37 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
43.92 GTexel/s
2.169 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1405 GFLOPS
90.37 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
43.92 GFLOPS
Board Design
122W
TDP
55W
300 W
Suggested PSU
-
2x DVI
2x DisplayPort 1.2
1x SDI
Outputs
No outputs
2x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GK104
GPU Name
GM107
-
GPU Variant
N16P-Q3-A2
Kepler
Architecture
Maxwell
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
3.54 billion
Transistors
1.87 billion
294 mm²
Die Size
148 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.1
Vulkan
1.3
3.0
CUDA
5.0
5.1
Shader Model
5.1
