Quadro K2000 vs RTX A5500
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 2GB VRAM Quadro K2000 and 24GB VRAM RTX A5500 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Quadro K2000 's Advantages
Lower TDP (51W vs 230W)
RTX A5500 's Advantages
Released 9 years late
Boost Clock1665MHz
More VRAM (24GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (768.0GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
9856 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro K2000
733
RTX A5500
+4552%
34100
Graphics Card
Mar 2013
Release Date
Mar 2022
Quadro
Generation
Quadro Ampere
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1080 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1665 MHz
1000 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
24GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
384bit
64.00GB/s
Bandwidth
768.0GB/s
Render Config
-
SM Count
80
384
Shading Units
10240
32
TMUs
320
16
ROPs
96
-
Tensor Cores
320
-
RT Cores
80
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
256 KB
L2 Cache
6 MB
Theoretical Performance
7.632 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
159.8 GPixel/s
30.53 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
532.8 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
34.10 TFLOPS
732.7 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
34.10 TFLOPS
30.53 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
532.8 GFLOPS
Board Design
51W
TDP
230W
250 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
1x DVI
2x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
GK107
GPU Name
GA102
GK107-301-A2
GPU Variant
-
Kepler
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
28 nm
Process Size
8 nm
1.27 billion
Transistors
28.3 billion
118 mm²
Die Size
628 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.1
Vulkan
1.3
3.0
CUDA
8.6
5.1
Shader Model
6.7
