Quadro K2000 vs Quadro RTX 3000 Max Q
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 2GB VRAM Quadro K2000 and 6GB VRAM Quadro RTX 3000 Max Q to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Quadro K2000 's Advantages
Lower TDP (51W vs 60W)
Quadro RTX 3000 Max Q 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock1215MHz
More VRAM (6GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (288.0GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
1536 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro K2000
733
Quadro RTX 3000 Max Q
+536%
4666
Graphics Card
Mar 2013
Release Date
May 2019
Quadro
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
600 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1215 MHz
1000 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
6GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
192bit
64.00GB/s
Bandwidth
288.0GB/s
Render Config
-
SM Count
30
384
Shading Units
1920
32
TMUs
120
16
ROPs
64
-
Tensor Cores
240
-
RT Cores
30
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
256 KB
L2 Cache
3 MB
Theoretical Performance
7.632 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
77.76 GPixel/s
30.53 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
145.8 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
9.331 TFLOPS
732.7 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
4.666 TFLOPS
30.53 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
145.8 GFLOPS
Board Design
51W
TDP
60W
250 W
Suggested PSU
-
1x DVI
2x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GK107
GPU Name
TU106
GK107-301-A2
GPU Variant
-
Kepler
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
12 nm
1.27 billion
Transistors
10.8 billion
118 mm²
Die Size
445 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.1
Vulkan
1.3
3.0
CUDA
7.5
5.1
Shader Model
6.6
