Quadro K2000 vs RTX A500 Mobile
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 2GB VRAM Quadro K2000 and 4GB VRAM RTX A500 Mobile to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
RTX A500 Mobile 's Advantages
Released 9 years late
Boost Clock1537MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (96.00GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
1664 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (30W vs 51W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro K2000
733
RTX A500 Mobile
+758%
6296
Graphics Card
Mar 2013
Release Date
Mar 2022
Quadro
Generation
Ampere-MW
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
832 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1537 MHz
1000 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
64bit
64.00GB/s
Bandwidth
96.00GB/s
Render Config
-
SM Count
16
384
Shading Units
2048
32
TMUs
64
16
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
64
-
RT Cores
16
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
256 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
Theoretical Performance
7.632 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
49.18 GPixel/s
30.53 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
98.37 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
6.296 TFLOPS
732.7 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
6.296 TFLOPS
30.53 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
98.37 GFLOPS
Board Design
51W
TDP
30W
250 W
Suggested PSU
-
1x DVI
2x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GK107
GPU Name
GA107S
GK107-301-A2
GPU Variant
-
Kepler
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
28 nm
Process Size
8 nm
1.27 billion
Transistors
8.7 billion
118 mm²
Die Size
200 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.1
Vulkan
1.3
3.0
CUDA
8.6
5.1
Shader Model
6.8
