Quadro K2000 vs RTX A1000 Embedded
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 2GB VRAM Quadro K2000 and 4GB VRAM RTX A1000 Embedded to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Quadro K2000 's Advantages
Lower TDP (51W vs 60W)
RTX A1000 Embedded 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock1627MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (224.0GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
1664 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro K2000
733
RTX A1000 Embedded
+809%
6664
Graphics Card
Mar 2013
Release Date
Jan 2022
Quadro
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1192 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1627 MHz
1000 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
64.00GB/s
Bandwidth
224.0GB/s
Render Config
-
SM Count
16
384
Shading Units
2048
32
TMUs
64
16
ROPs
48
-
Tensor Cores
64
-
RT Cores
16
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
256 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
Theoretical Performance
7.632 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
78.10 GPixel/s
30.53 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
104.1 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
6.664 TFLOPS
732.7 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
6.664 TFLOPS
30.53 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
104.1 GFLOPS
Board Design
51W
TDP
60W
250 W
Suggested PSU
-
1x DVI
2x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GK107
GPU Name
GA107S
GK107-301-A2
GPU Variant
-
Kepler
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
28 nm
Process Size
8 nm
1.27 billion
Transistors
Unknown
118 mm²
Die Size
Unknown
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.1
Vulkan
1.3
3.0
CUDA
8.6
5.1
Shader Model
6.6
