Quadro K2000 vs Radeon Instinct MI210
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 2GB VRAM Quadro K2000 and 64GB VRAM Radeon Instinct MI210 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Quadro K2000 's Advantages
Lower TDP (51W vs 300W)
Radeon Instinct MI210 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock1700MHz
More VRAM (64GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1638GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
6272 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro K2000
733
Radeon Instinct MI210
+2987%
22630
Graphics Card
Mar 2013
Release Date
Dec 2021
Quadro
Generation
Radeon Instinct
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1000 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1700 MHz
1000 MHz
Memory Clock
1600 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
64GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
HBM2e
128bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
64.00GB/s
Bandwidth
1638GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
104
384
Shading Units
6656
32
TMUs
416
16
ROPs
0
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
256 KB
L2 Cache
16 MB
Theoretical Performance
7.632 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
0 MPixel/s
30.53 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
707.2 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
181.0 TFLOPS
732.7 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
22.63 TFLOPS
30.53 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
22.63 TFLOPS
Board Design
51W
TDP
300W
250 W
Suggested PSU
700 W
1x DVI
2x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
GK107
GPU Name
Aldebaran
GK107-301-A2
GPU Variant
Aldebaran
Kepler
Architecture
CDNA 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
6 nm
1.27 billion
Transistors
58.2 billion
118 mm²
Die Size
Unknown
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
N/A
4.6
OpenGL
N/A
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.1
Vulkan
N/A
3.0
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
N/A
