Quadro K2000 vs Tesla M6
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 2GB VRAM Quadro K2000 and 8GB VRAM Tesla M6 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Quadro K2000 's Advantages
Lower TDP (51W vs 100W)
Tesla M6 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock1180MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (160.4GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
1152 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro K2000
733
Tesla M6
+394%
3625
Graphics Card
Mar 2013
Release Date
Aug 2015
Quadro
Generation
Tesla
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
930 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1180 MHz
1000 MHz
Memory Clock
1253 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
64.00GB/s
Bandwidth
160.4GB/s
Render Config
384
Shading Units
1536
32
TMUs
96
16
ROPs
64
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SMM)
256 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
Theoretical Performance
7.632 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
75.52 GPixel/s
30.53 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
113.3 GTexel/s
732.7 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.625 TFLOPS
30.53 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
113.3 GFLOPS
Board Design
51W
TDP
100W
250 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
1x DVI
2x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GK107
GPU Name
GM204
GK107-301-A2
GPU Variant
GM204-995-A1
Kepler
Architecture
Maxwell 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
1.27 billion
Transistors
5.2 billion
118 mm²
Die Size
398 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.1
Vulkan
1.3
3.0
CUDA
5.2
5.1
Shader Model
6.4
