Quadro K2000 vs Quadro FX 580
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 2GB VRAM Quadro K2000 and 512MB VRAM Quadro FX 580 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Quadro K2000 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 11 months late
More VRAM (2GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (64.00GB/s vs 25.60GB/s)
352 additional rendering cores
Quadro FX 580 's Advantages
Lower TDP (40W vs 51W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro K2000
+918%
733
Quadro FX 580
72
Graphics Card
Mar 2013
Release Date
Apr 2009
Quadro
Generation
Quadro FX
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1000 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
64.00GB/s
Bandwidth
25.60GB/s
Render Config
-
SM Count
4
384
Shading Units
32
32
TMUs
16
16
ROPs
8
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
-
256 KB
L2 Cache
32 KB
Theoretical Performance
7.632 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
3.600 GPixel/s
30.53 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
7.200 GTexel/s
732.7 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
72.00 GFLOPS
30.53 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
51W
TDP
40W
250 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x DVI
2x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x DVI
2x DisplayPort
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GK107
GPU Name
G96C
GK107-301-A2
GPU Variant
G96-875-C1
Kepler
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
55 nm
1.27 billion
Transistors
0.314 billion
118 mm²
Die Size
121 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.1
Vulkan
N/A
3.0
CUDA
1.1
5.1
Shader Model
4.0
