Home Comparison Quadro K2000 vs L40G

Quadro K2000 vs L40G

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 2GB VRAM Quadro K2000 and 24GB VRAM L40G to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Quadro K2000 's Advantages
Lower TDP (51W vs 300W)
L40G 's Advantages
Released 9 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock2475MHz
More VRAM (24GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (864.0GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
17792 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro K2000
733
L40G +12174%
89970

Graphics Card

Mar 2013
Release Date
Oct 2022
Quadro
Generation
Tesla Ada
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1005 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2475 MHz
1000 MHz
Memory Clock
2250 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
24GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
384bit
64.00GB/s
Bandwidth
864.0GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
142
384
Shading Units
18176
32
TMUs
568
16
ROPs
192
-
Tensor Cores
568
-
RT Cores
142
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
256 KB
L2 Cache
48 MB

Theoretical Performance

7.632 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
475.2 GPixel/s
30.53 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
1406 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
89.97 TFLOPS
732.7 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
89.97 TFLOPS
30.53 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
1406 GFLOPS

Board Design

51W
TDP
300W
250 W
Suggested PSU
700 W
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.1 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
1x 16-pin

Graphics Processor

GK107
GPU Name
AD102
GK107-301-A2
GPU Variant
AD102-???-A1
Kepler
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
4 nm
1.27 billion
Transistors
76.3 billion
118 mm²
Die Size
608 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.1
Vulkan
1.3
3.0
CUDA
8.9
5.1
Shader Model
6.6
© 2025 - TopCPU.net