Quadro K2000 vs Quadro K5200
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 2GB VRAM Quadro K2000 and 8GB VRAM Quadro K5200 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Quadro K2000 's Advantages
Lower TDP (51W vs 150W)
Quadro K5200 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock771MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.3GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
1920 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro K2000
733
Quadro K5200
+384%
3553
Graphics Card
Mar 2013
Release Date
Jul 2014
Quadro
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
667 MHz
-
Boost Clock
771 MHz
1000 MHz
Memory Clock
1502 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
64.00GB/s
Bandwidth
192.3GB/s
Render Config
384
Shading Units
2304
32
TMUs
192
16
ROPs
48
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
-
256 KB
L2 Cache
-
Theoretical Performance
7.632 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
37.01 GPixel/s
30.53 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
148.0 GTexel/s
732.7 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.553 TFLOPS
30.53 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
148.0 GFLOPS
Board Design
51W
TDP
150W
250 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x DVI
2x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
2x DVI
2x DisplayPort 1.2
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
GK107
GPU Name
GK110B
GK107-301-A2
GPU Variant
-
Kepler
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
1.27 billion
Transistors
7.08 billion
118 mm²
Die Size
561 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.1
Vulkan
1.1
3.0
CUDA
3.5
5.1
Shader Model
5.1
