Quadro K2000 vs Quadro GP100
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 2GB VRAM Quadro K2000 and 16GB VRAM Quadro GP100 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Quadro K2000 's Advantages
Lower TDP (51W vs 235W)
Quadro GP100 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock1442MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (732.2GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
3200 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro K2000
733
Quadro GP100
+1310%
10340
Graphics Card
Mar 2013
Release Date
Oct 2016
Quadro
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1304 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1442 MHz
1000 MHz
Memory Clock
715 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
HBM2
128bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
64.00GB/s
Bandwidth
732.2GB/s
Render Config
-
SM Count
56
384
Shading Units
3584
32
TMUs
224
16
ROPs
96
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
24 KB (per SM)
256 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB
Theoretical Performance
7.632 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
138.4 GPixel/s
30.53 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
323.0 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
20.67 TFLOPS
732.7 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
10.34 TFLOPS
30.53 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
5.168 TFLOPS
Board Design
51W
TDP
235W
250 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
1x DVI
2x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x DVI
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
GK107
GPU Name
GP100
GK107-301-A2
GPU Variant
-
Kepler
Architecture
Pascal
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
16 nm
1.27 billion
Transistors
15.3 billion
118 mm²
Die Size
610 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.1
Vulkan
1.3
3.0
CUDA
6.0
5.1
Shader Model
6.4
