Quadro FX 4800 Mac Edition vs Quadro P2000
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 1536MB VRAM Quadro FX 4800 Mac Edition and 5GB VRAM Quadro P2000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Quadro P2000 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 3 months late
Boost Clock1480MHz
More VRAM (5GB vs 1536GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (140.2GB/s vs 76.80GB/s)
832 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (75W vs 150W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro FX 4800 Mac Edition
462
Quadro P2000
+556%
3031
Graphics Card
Nov 2008
Release Date
Feb 2017
Quadro FX
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1076 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1480 MHz
800 MHz
Memory Clock
1752 MHz
Memory
1536MB
Memory Size
5GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
384bit
Memory Bus
160bit
76.80GB/s
Bandwidth
140.2GB/s
Render Config
24
SM Count
8
192
Shading Units
1024
64
TMUs
64
24
ROPs
40
-
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SM)
192 KB
L2 Cache
1280 KB
Theoretical Performance
14.45 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
59.20 GPixel/s
38.53 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
94.72 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
47.36 GFLOPS
462.3 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.031 TFLOPS
57.79 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
94.72 GFLOPS
Board Design
150W
TDP
75W
450 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
2x DVI
1x S-Video
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GT200B
GPU Name
GP106
-
GPU Variant
GP106-875-A1
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
Pascal
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
16 nm
1.4 billion
Transistors
4.4 billion
470 mm²
Die Size
200 mm²
Graphics Features
11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.3
CUDA
6.1
4.0
Shader Model
6.4
