Quadro FX 4800 Mac Edition vs Quadro FX 3700
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 1536MB VRAM Quadro FX 4800 Mac Edition and 512MB VRAM Quadro FX 3700 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Quadro FX 4800 Mac Edition 's Advantages
Released 10 months late
More VRAM (1536GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (76.80GB/s vs 51.20GB/s)
80 additional rendering cores
Quadro FX 3700 's Advantages
Lower TDP (78W vs 150W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro FX 4800 Mac Edition
+65%
462
Quadro FX 3700
280
Graphics Card
Nov 2008
Release Date
Jan 2008
Quadro FX
Generation
Quadro FX
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
800 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz
Memory
1536MB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR3
384bit
Memory Bus
256bit
76.80GB/s
Bandwidth
51.20GB/s
Render Config
24
SM Count
14
192
Shading Units
112
64
TMUs
56
24
ROPs
16
192 KB
L2 Cache
64 KB
Theoretical Performance
14.45 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
8.000 GPixel/s
38.53 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
28.00 GTexel/s
462.3 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
280.0 GFLOPS
57.79 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
150W
TDP
78W
450 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
2x DVI
1x S-Video
Outputs
2x DVI
1x S-Video
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
GT200B
GPU Name
G92
-
GPU Variant
G92-875-A2
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
65 nm
1.4 billion
Transistors
0.754 billion
470 mm²
Die Size
324 mm²
Graphics Features
11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
3.3
OpenGL
3.3
1.1
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
1.3
CUDA
1.1
4.0
Shader Model
4.0
