Home Comparison Quadro FX 3450 vs GeForce GTX 1650 GDDR6

Quadro FX 3450 vs GeForce GTX 1650 GDDR6

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 256MB VRAM Quadro FX 3450 and 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1650 GDDR6 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

GeForce GTX 1650 GDDR6 's Advantages
Released 14 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock1590MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.0GB/s vs 32.00GB/s)
896 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (75W vs 83W)

Score

Graphics Card

Jul 2005
Release Date
Apr 2020
Quadro FX Curie
Generation
GeForce 16
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1410 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1590 MHz
500 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz

Memory

256MB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
32.00GB/s
Bandwidth
192.0GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
14
-
Shading Units
896
12
TMUs
56
8
ROPs
32
-
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
-
L2 Cache
1024 KB

Theoretical Performance

3.400 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
50.88 GPixel/s
5.100 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
89.04 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
5.699 TFLOPS
-
FP32 (float)
2.849 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
89.04 GFLOPS

Board Design

83W
TDP
75W
250 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
2x DVI 1x S-Video
Outputs
1x DVI 1x HDMI 2.0 1x DisplayPort 1.4a
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

NV41
GPU Name
TU117
NV41 GL
GPU Variant
TU117-300-A1
Curie
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
130 nm
Process Size
12 nm
0.19 billion
Transistors
4.7 billion
225 mm²
Die Size
200 mm²

Graphics Features

9.0c (9_3)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
2.0 (full) 2.1 (partial)
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
7.5
3.0
Shader Model
6.6
© 2025 - TopCPU.net