Quadro 3000M vs Quadro T1000 Mobile GDDR6
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 2GB VRAM Quadro 3000M and 4GB VRAM Quadro T1000 Mobile GDDR6 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Quadro T1000 Mobile GDDR6 's Advantages
Released 9 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock1650MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.0GB/s vs 80.00GB/s)
656 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (50W vs 75W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro 3000M
432
Quadro T1000 Mobile GDDR6
+584%
2957
Graphics Card
Feb 2011
Release Date
Jun 2020
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1395 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1650 MHz
625 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
80.00GB/s
Bandwidth
192.0GB/s
Render Config
5
SM Count
14
240
Shading Units
896
40
TMUs
56
32
ROPs
32
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
512 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
Theoretical Performance
4.500 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
52.80 GPixel/s
18.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
92.40 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
5.914 TFLOPS
432.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.957 TFLOPS
36.00 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
92.40 GFLOPS
Board Design
75W
TDP
50W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GF104
GPU Name
TU117B
N12E-Q1-A1
GPU Variant
N19P-Q1-A1
Fermi
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
12 nm
1.95 billion
Transistors
4.7 billion
332 mm²
Die Size
200 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
2.1
CUDA
7.5
5.1
Shader Model
6.6
