Quadro 3000M vs Quadro P5000 Mobile
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 2GB VRAM Quadro 3000M and 16GB VRAM Quadro P5000 Mobile to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Quadro 3000M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (75W vs 100W)
Quadro P5000 Mobile 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock1582MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.3GB/s vs 80.00GB/s)
1808 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro 3000M
432
Quadro P5000 Mobile
+1400%
6480
Graphics Card
Feb 2011
Release Date
Jan 2017
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
MXM-B (3.0)
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1278 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1582 MHz
625 MHz
Memory Clock
1502 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
80.00GB/s
Bandwidth
192.3GB/s
Render Config
5
SM Count
16
240
Shading Units
2048
40
TMUs
128
32
ROPs
64
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SM)
512 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
Theoretical Performance
4.500 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
101.2 GPixel/s
18.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
202.5 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
101.2 GFLOPS
432.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
6.480 TFLOPS
36.00 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
202.5 GFLOPS
Board Design
75W
TDP
100W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GF104
GPU Name
GP104
N12E-Q1-A1
GPU Variant
N17E-Q5-A1
Fermi
Architecture
Pascal
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
16 nm
1.95 billion
Transistors
7.2 billion
332 mm²
Die Size
314 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
2.1
CUDA
6.1
5.1
Shader Model
6.4
